Response to the letter to editor

Document Type : Letter to the editor


Division of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan


No Abstract is available


Main Subjects

  1. Pierce LA 2nd, Elston BF, Clunie DA, Nelson D, Kinahan PE. A digital reference object to analyze calculation accuracy of PET standardized uptake value. Radiology. 2015;277(2):538-45.
  2. Kinahan P, Pierce L, Elston B, Clunie D, Nelson D. An FDG-PET/CT digital reference object for testing ROI and SUV calculations. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(Supple 1):607.
  3. Harrison RL, Elston BF, Byrd DW, Alessio AM, Jacobs J, Rockne RC, et al. A digital reference object for the 3D Hoffman brain phantom for characterization of PET neuroimaging quality. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, Seoul, South Korea; 27 Oct.-2 Nov. 2013.
  4. Akamatsu M, Yamashita Y, Akamatsu G, Tsutsui Y, Ohya N, Nakamura Y, et al. Influences of reconstruction and attenuation correction in brain SPECT images obtained by the hybrid SPECT/CT device: evaluation with a 3-dimensional brain phantom. Asia Oceania J Nucl Med Biol. 2014;2(1):24-9.
  5. Digital reference object. Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA). Available at: URL:; 2018.
  6. Dikaios N, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Graves MJ, Mani V, Fayad ZA, Fryer TD. MRI-based motion correction of thoracic PET initial comparison of acquisition protocols and correction strategies suitable for simultaneous PET MRI systems. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(2):439-46
  7. Lasnon C, Desmonts C, Quak E, Gervais R, Do P, Dubos-Arvis C, et al. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(7):985-96.
  8. Kelly MD, Declerck JM. SUVref: reducing reconstruction-dependent variation in PET SUV. EJNMMI Res. 2011;1(1):16.