Clinical significance of completion of radium-223 treatment and acute adverse events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

2 Department of Radiation Oncology, South Miyagi Medical Center, Ogawara , Japan

3 Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki, Japan

5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Prefectural Isawa Hospital, Oshu, Japan

6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Ishinomaki Hospital, Ishinomaki, Japan

7 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, Japan

8 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan

9 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwaki City Medical Center, Iwaki, Japan

10 Department of Radiation Oncology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan

11 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Prefectural Iwai Hospital, Ichinoseki, Japan

12 Department of Radiation Oncology, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan

13 Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Prefectural Ofunato Hospital, Ofunato, Japan

Abstract

Objective(s): In the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastases, radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is the only bone-targeted drug that shows survival benefits. Completing six courses of Ra-223 treatment is thought to be associated with better patient survival, but this treatment has a relatively high rate of acute adverse events.
Methods: This retrospective study included 85 patients from 12 institutions in Japan to investigate the clinical significance of the completion of Ra-223 treatment and acute adverse events in CRPC patients.
Results: Six courses of Ra-223 treatment were completed in 65.9% of the patients. Grade 3 or higher acute adverse events were observed in 27.1% of patients. The prostate specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase declined at 26.9% and 87.9%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 80.7% and 63.2%, respectively. Both completion of six courses of Ra-223 treatment and absence of grade 3 or higher acute adverse events were associated with longer overall survival. In univariate analysis, factors related to the history of treatment (five or more hormone therapy agents and cytotoxic chemotherapy) and hematological parameters (Prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, albumin, and serum calcium) were associated with completing six courses of Ra-223 treatment without experiencing grade 3 or higher acute adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed that a history of chemotherapy, PSA doubling time, hemoglobin, and serum calcium showed statistical significance. We built a predictive score by these four factors. Patients with lower scores showed higher rates of treatment success (p<0.001) and longer overall survival (p<0.001) with statistical significance.
Conclusions: Accomplishing six courses of Ra-223 treatment without grade 3 or higher acute adverse events was a prognostic factor in patients with mCRPC treated with Ra-223. We built a predictive score of treatment success and need future external validation.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Santis MD, Gross T, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017; 71 (4):630–42.
  2. Smith MR, Kabbinavar F, Saad F, Hussain A, Gittelman MC, Bilhartz DL, et al. Natural History of Rising Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men With Castrate Non metastatic Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 (13):2918–25.
  3. Crawford ED, Petrylak DP, Shore N, Saad F, Slovin SF, Vogelzang NJ, et al. The role of therapeutic layering in optimizing treatment for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (Prostate Cancer Radiographic Assessments for Detection of Advanced Recurrence II). Urology. 2017; 104:150–9.
  4. Poeppel TD, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Andreeff M, Becherer A, Bockisch A, Fricke E, et al. EANM guideline for radionuclide therapy with radium-223 of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2018; 45 (5):824–45.
  5. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. New Engl J Medicine. 2013; 369 (3):213–23.
  6. Saad F, Gillessen S, Heinrich D, Keizman D, O’Sullivan JM, Nilsson S, et al. Disease characteristics and completion of treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium-223 in an iternational early access program. Clin Genitourin Canc. 2019; 17 (5):348-355.e5.
  7. Miyoshi Y, Tsutsumi S, Yasui M, Kawahara T, Uemura K ichi, Hayashi N, et al. A novel prediction model for the completion of six cycles of radium-223 treatment and survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2021; 39(9):3323-3328.
  8. Saad F, Carles J, Gillessen S, Heidenreich A, Heinrich D, Gratt J, et al. Radium-223 and concomitant therapies in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international, early access, open-label, single-arm phase 3b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17 (9):1306–16.
  9. Turco F, Tucci M, Angusti T, Parente A, Stefano RFD, Urban S, et al. Role of radium-223 discontinuation due to adverse events in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. A retrospective monocentric Tumori J. 2022; 030089162210771.
  10. Parikh S, Murray L, Kenning L, Bottomley D, Din O, Dixit S, et al. Real-world Outcomes and Factors Predicting Survival and Completion of Radium 223 in Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol. 2018; 30 (9):548–55.
  11. Zhou T, Zhou F, Guo J, Shi H, Yao X, Guo H, et al. Radium‐223 in Asian patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases: A single‐arm phase 3 study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021; 17 (6):462–70.
  12. Heidenreich A, Gillessen S, Heinrich D, Keizman D, O’Sullivan JM, Carles J, et al. Radium-223 in asymptomatic patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases treated in an international early access program. Bmc Cancer. 2019; 19 (1):12.
  13. Matsubara N, Nagamori S, Wakumoto Y, Uemura H, Kimura G, Yokomizo A, et al. Phase II study of radium-223 dichloride in Japanese patients with symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018; 23 (1):173–80.
  14. Sartor O, Coleman RE, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, et al. An exploratory analysis of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial with radium-223. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(5):1090-1097.
  15. Yamamoto Y, Okuda Y, Kanaki T, Tanaka R, Nagahara A, Nakai Y, et al. Clinical indicators for predicting prognosis after radium-223 administration in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021; 26 (1):192–8.
  16. Utsumi N, Kurosaki H, Miura K, Kitoh H, Akakura K. Pretreatment PSA levels affects the completion rate of Ra-223 treatment.Sci Rep-uk. 2021; 11 (1):6476.
  17. Vidal M, Delgado A, Martinez C, Correa JJ, Durango IC. Overall survival prediction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223. Int Braz J Urol. 2020; 46 (4):599–611.
  18. Wong WW, Anderson EM, Mohammadi H, Daniels TB, Schild SE, Keole SR, et al. Factors Associated With Survival Following Radium-223 Treatment for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Canc. 2017; 15 (6):e969–75.
  19. Body JJ, Moos R von, Niepel D, Tombal B. Hypocalcaemia in patients with prostate cancer treated with a bisphosphonate or denosumab: prevention supports treatment completion. Bmc Urol. 2018; 18 (1):81.
  20. Lau L, Cliff ERS, Wong V, Wong H, Torkamani N, Eer A, et al. Hypocalcaemia following denosumab in prostate cancer: A clinical review. Clin Endocrinol. 2020; 92 (6):495–502.