Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Local research productivity, trends, and collaboration among Filipino nuclear medicine physicians: A bibliometric analysis of the Philippine Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
John Kenneth V Gacula
Raniv D. Rojo
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
10.22038/aojnmb.2026.93010.1689
Abstract
Objective(s): The Philippine Journal of Nuclear Medicine, the official publication and peer-reviewed journal of the Philippine Society of Nuclear Medicine, serves as a primary repository of research articles by Filipino nuclear medicine physicians. Despite rapid global developments in nuclear medicine, local research output remains underexplored. With 20 volumes and multiple articles published, the PJNM best reflects the situation of nuclear medicine research in the country. This study analyzed and described local research productivity through a bibliometric analysis of PJNM from 2002 to 2025.
Methods:Full-text research articles were retrieved from both physical and online sources. Eligible articles were classified by study type. Bibliographic data such as authorship and institutional affiliation were extracted. Descriptive statistics and bibliometric mapping using VOSviewer were employed to evaluate publication trends, collaboration networks, and keyword occurrences.
Results:A total of 134 full text articles were included. Publication output peaked during 2010-2012, followed by stable but modest productivity in subsequent years. Observational studies (53%) comprised the majority of publications, followed by case report/series (40%), and meta-analyses/systematic review (7%). No experimental studies were published. JM Obaldo was the most prolific author (n=24), while GFL Goco demonstrated the strongest collaborative links (37). St. Luke’s Medical Center-Quezon City produced the highest research output and linkages. Keyword mapping revealed seven thematic clusters, namely: bone imaging, cardiac and parathyroid scintigraphy, radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid cancer, pediatric scintigraphy, prostate cancer and theranostics, MPI SPECT image quality, and renal scintigraphy. The more recent articles focused on oncology, PET/CT, and theranostics.
Conclusion:PJNM reflects the growth and evolving focus of nuclear medicine research in the Philippines. While research output is diverse and increasingly aligned with international trends, there is a need to strengthen experimental and translational studies, foster broader collaborations, and achieve international indexing to enhance visibility and global impact.
Keywords
Bibliometric analysis
Filipino
Research
Productivity
Subjects
Obaldo JM. The fourth decade of the PSNM. In: 1966-2016: A Salute to 50 Years of the Philippine Society of Nuclear Medicine. Published by Philippine Medical Association, Manila, Philippine, 2016. 4-15.
2. Philippine Journal of Nuclear Medicine. In: Philippine society of Nuclear Medicine. https://psnm.ph/journal.  Accessed on1 Jun 2025.
1.    Bautista PA, Luis TOLS. Nuclear medicine in the Philippines: A glance at the past, a gaze at the present, and a glimpse of the Future. Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2016; 4(2):113-8.
2.    Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014; 21(10):1160-72. 
3.    Li V, Mdletshe S. Evaluation of New Zealand’s radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging research output: A bibliometric‐based approach. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2025; 72(3): 315-24.
4.    Lei J, Yu P, Xu B, Wang R, Shen Z, Jia Z, et al. Worldwide research productivity in nuclear medicine literature. Nuklearmedizin. 2018; 57(06):234-41.
5.    Abramo G, D’Angelo CA. How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics. 2014; 101(2):1129-44.
6.    Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 133:285-96.
7.    Vargas-Quesada B, de Moya-Anegón F. Visualizing the Structure of Science. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2007.
8.    Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010; 84(2):523-38.
9.    Pajares Vinardell M, Freire Macías JM. Twenty-five years of the Spanish Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Bibliometric study. Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition). 2007; 26(6): 345-53.
10.Vijayakumar P, Sivasubramanian G, Saraswati Rao M. Bibliometric analysis of Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine (2014 – 2018). Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2019; 9(1): 122-7.
11.Obaldo JM. Birth of a journal. Philippine Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2002; 1(1):2A.
12.Obaldo JM. On second wind. Philippine Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2010; 5(2):33.
13.  Pascual TN, Obaldo JM, Luis Jr TO, Leus MJ. Assessing residents in a nuclear medicine physician training program: The Philippine experience. InRadiology Education: The Evaluation and Assessment of Clinical Competence 2012 Feb 22 (pp. 143-156). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14.  Yan S, Zhang H, Wang J. Trends and hot topics in radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging from 2011–2021: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2022; 40(8): 847-56.
15.  Baek S, Yoon DY, Min KJ, Lim KJ, Seo YL, Yun EJ. Characteristics and trends of research on positron emission tomography: a biblio-metric analysis, 2002-2012. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2014; 28(5):455-62.
16.Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of informetrics. 2016; 10(4):1178-95. 
17.Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods. 2015; 18(3):429-72. 
18.Guo X. A bibliometric analysis of child language during 1900–2021. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 862042.
19.Ageel M. Pandemic critical care research during the COVID‐19 (2020‐2022): A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. BioMed Research International. 2022; 2022(1): 8564649.
20.Pascual TNB, Paez D, Iagaru A, Gnanasegaran G, Lee ST, Sathekge M, et al. Guiding principles on the education and practice of theranostics. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2024; 51(8): 2320-31. 
21.Blackard JT, Knapke JM, Schuckman S, Veevers J, Hardie WD, Yadav R, et al. Online, asynchronous training in research for residents. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 2024; 8(1): e180. 
22.Neacy K, Stern SA, Kim HM, Dronen SC. Resident perception of academic skills training and impact on academic career choice. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000; 7(12):1408-15. 
23.Onyekaba G, Mauch JT, Barrero C, Mellia JA, Diatta F, Card E, et al. Does dedicated research time during residency predict resident academic productivity and a future academic career? Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2022; 88(3):S293-5.
24.Chang CWD, Mills JC. Effects of a reward system on resident research productivity. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2013; 139(12):1285.
25.Layon DR, Wang C, Su M, Mulcahey MK. The value of formal research training in orthopaedic surgery residency. MedEdPublish. 2017; 6:146.
26.   Robbins L, Bostrom M, Marx R, Roberts T, Sculco TP. Restructuring the orthopedic resident research curriculum to increase scholarly activity. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2013; 5(4):646-51.
27.Dobkin BH. Collaborative models for translational neuroscience and rehabilitation research. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009; 23(7):633-40.
28.Nott M, Schmidt D, Thomas M, Reilly K, Saksena T, Kennedy J, et al. Collaborations between health services and educational institutions to develop research capacity in health services and health service staff: a systematic scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 2024; 24(1):1363.
29.Apor ADAO, Jamora RDG. Research productivity among Filipino neurologists associated with socioeconomic, healthcare, and disease burden factors: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23): 15630.
30.Kocak B, Baessler B, Cuocolo R, Mercaldo N, Pinto dos Santos D. Trends and statistics of artificial intelligence and radiomics research in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging: Bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Radiology. 2023; 33(11): 7542-55.
31.Baek S, Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Hong JH, Moon JY, Seo YL, et al. Top-cited articles versus top Altmetric articles in nuclear medicine: a comparative bibliometric analysis. Acta radiologica. 2020; 61(10):1343-9.
32.San Juan M Des, Paz-Pacheco E. Incidence, recurrence and mortality among Filipinos with differentiated thyroid cancer: A systematic review. Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2023; 38(1): 100-7.
33.Bauckneht M, Ciccarese C, Laudicella R, Mosillo C, D’Amico F, Anghelone A, et al. Theranostics revolution in prostate cancer: Basics, clinical applications, open issues and future perspectives. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2024; 124: 102698.
34.Suriyong P, Ruengorn C, Shayakul C, Anantachoti P, Kanjanarat P. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease stages 3–5 in low- and middle-income countries in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2): e0264393.
35.Hephzibah J. Role of nuclear medicine in evaluation of renal system. Current Medical Issues. 2018; 16(4): 148.
36. Tecson-Mendoza EM. Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges. Science Editing. 2015; 2(2):73-8.
37.    Utrobičić A, Chaudhry N, Ghaffar A, Marušić A. Bridging knowledge translation gap in health in developing countries: visibility, impact and publishing standards in journals from the Eastern Mediterranean. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012; 12(1): 66.
38.Herrmann LE, Hall M, Kyler K, Cochran J, Andrews AL, Williams DJ, et al. The Pipeline from abstract presentation to publication in pediatric hospital medicine. Journal of Hospital Medicine.2018; 13(2):90-5.
39.Guindon GE, Lavis JN, Becerra-Posada F, Malek-Afzali H, Shi G, Yesudian CAK, et al. Bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a survey of health care providers. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2010; 182(9): E362-72. 
40.Ortega JL. The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations). Aslib Journal of Information Management. 2017; 69(6): 674-87.
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 14, Issue 2
July 2026
Pages 157-172