C-11 Choline and FDG PET/CT Imaging of Primary Cholangiocarcinoma – a Comparative Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand

2 Surgery Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand

3 Pathology Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand

Abstract

Objective(s): This study aimed to compare the diagnostic values of 11C-choline and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).
Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 10 patients (6 males and 4 females), aged 42-69 years, suspected of having CCA based on CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. 11C-choline and 18F-FDG PET/CT studies were performed in all patients over 1 week. PET/CT results were visually analyzed by 2 independent nuclear medicine physicians and quantitatively by calculating the tumor-to-background ratio (T/B).
Results: No 11C-choline PET/CT uptake was observed in primary extrahepatic or intrahepatic CCA cases. Intense 18F-FDG avidity was detected in the tumors of 8 patients (%80). Two patients, who were 18F-FDG negative, had primary extrahepatic CCA. Ki-67 measurements were positive in all patients (range; 14.2%-39.9%). The average T/B values of 11C-choline and 18F-FDG were 0.4±0.2 and 2.0±1.0 in all cases of primary CCA, respectively; these values were significantly lower for 11C-choline (P<0.005). Both FDG and 11C-choline PET/CT detected metastatic CCA foci in all 8 patients (two patients had no metastases).
Conclusion: As the results suggested, primary CCA lesions showed a poor avidity for 11C-choline, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT was of value for the detection of most primary CCA cases. In contrast to primary lesions, metastatic CCA lesions showed 11C-choline avidity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Shin HR, Oh JK, Masuyer E, Curado MP, Bouvard V, Fang YY, et al. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: an update focusing on risk factors. Cancer Sci.2010;101(3):579-85.
2. Attasara P BR. Hospital-based cancer registry 2009. Bangkok: Ramthai Press;2010.
3. Vatanasapt V PD, Sriamporn S. Epidemiology of liver cancer in Thailand. Khon Kaen (Thailand): Sriphan Press; 2000.
4. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB. Cancer in Five Continents 2002. IARC: Lyon; Vol VIII
5. Malhi H, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: modern advances in understanding a deadly old disease. J Hepatol. 2006; 45(6):856-67.
6. Zech CJ, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Helmberger T. Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors: current clinical status and future developments. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(7):1174-87.
7. Sainani NI, Catalano OA, Holalkere NS, Zhu AX, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Cholangiocarcinoma: current and novel imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2008; 28(5):1263-87.
8. Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin R, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Taylor-Robinson SD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document. Gut. 2002; 51 Suppl 6:Vi1-9.
9. Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, Chapman WC, Chari RS, Delbeke D. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8(1):90-7.
10. Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Akhurst T, DeMatteo RP, D'Angelica M, Fong Y, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography influences management decisions in patients with biliary cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206(1):57 65.
11. Breitenstein S, Apestegui C, Clavien PA. Positron emission tomography (PET) for cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2008; 10(2):120-1.
12. Lee SW, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, et al. Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45(5):560-6.
13. Petrowsky H, Wildbrett P, Husarik DB, Hany TF, Tam S, Jochum W, et al. Impact of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography on staging and management of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2006; 45(1):43-50.
14. Talbot JN, Fartoux L, Balogova S, Nataf V, Kerrou K, Gutman F, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with PET/CT: a prospective comparison of 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-FDG in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51(11):1699-706.
15. Picchio M, Briganti A, Fanti S, Heidenreich A, Krause BJ, Messa C, et al. The role of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with prostatespecific antigen progression after radical treatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011; 59(1):51-60.
16. Skoura E, Datseris IE. The use of 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorocholine in imaging with positron emission tomography. Hell J Nucl Med. 2010; 13(1):88-90.
17. Treglia G, Giovannini E, Di Franco D, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, Picchio M, et al. The role of positron emission tomography using carbon-11 and fluorine-18 choline in tumors other than prostate cancer: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(6):451-61.
18. Li J, Kuehl H, Grabellus F, Muller SP, Radunz S, Antoch G, et al. Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by dual-modality PET/CT. J Surg Oncol. 2008; 98(6):438-43.
19. Kim JY, Kim MH, Lee TY, Hwang CY, Kim JS, Yun SC, et al. Clinical role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in suspected and potentially operable cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective study compared with conventional imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(5):1145-51.
20. Jadvar H, Henderson RW, Conti PS. [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography: computed tomography in recurrent and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007; 31(2):223-8.
21. Annunziata S, Caldarella C, Pizzuto DA, Galiandro F, Sadeghi R, Giovanella L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of the primary tumor in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:247693.
22. Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Broering DC, Jenicke L, Schafer H, Buchert R, et al. FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2001; 22(12):1277-85.
23. Nejjari M, Kryza D, Poncet G, Roche C, Perek N, Chayvialle JA, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies with [(18)F]fluorocholine on digestive tumoral cell lines and in an animal model of metastasized endocrine tumor. Nucl Med Biol. 2008; 35(1):123-30.
24. Qayyum A. MR spectroscopy of the liver: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2009; 29(6):1653-64.
25. Langsteger W, Heinisch M, Fogelman I. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-choline, and 18F-fluoride in bone imaging with emphasis on prostate and breast. Semin Nucl Med. 2006; 36(1):73-92.
26. Schillaci O, Calabria F, Tavolozza M, Ciccio C, Carlani M, Caracciolo CR, et al. 18F-choline PET/CT physiological distribution and pitfalls in image interpretation: experience in 80 patients with prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2010; 31(1):39-45.
27. Rietbergen DD, van der Hiel B, Vogel W, Stokkel MP. Mediastinal lymph node uptake in patients with prostate carcinoma on F18-choline PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(12):1143-7.
28. Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128(6):1655-67.
29. Petrowsky H, Sturm I, Graubitz O, Kooby DA, Staib-Sebler E, Gog C, et al. Relevance of Ki-67 antigen expression and K-ras mutation in colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001; 27(1):80-7.
30. Yu CC, Filipe MI. Update on proliferation-associated antibodies applicable to formalin-fixed paraffinembedded tissue and their clinical applications. Histochem J. 1993; 25(12):843-53.
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January 2015
Pages 18-25

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics